FLoraTeX® Bermudagrass

University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Bulletin 891

Authors

Dr. A.E. Dudeck is Professor of Environmental Horticulture,
University of Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670.
Dr. J.B. Beard and Mr. S.I. Sifers are Professor Emeritus and Research Associate of Turfgrass Physiology,
respectively, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University,
College Station, TX 77843-2474.
Dr. J.A. Reinert is Professor of Entomology and Resident Director,
Texas A & M University Research and Extension Center, Dallas, TX 75252-6599.

Contents

FLoraTeX® Bermudagrass

FLoraTeX® bermudagrass is a joint release of the Florida and Texas Agricultural Experiment Stations. FLoraTeX® is a low maintenance bermudagrass for cemeteries, golf course fairways and roughs, lawns, parks, and sports turfs in warm-humid and warm-semiarid climatic regions of the United States. Its merits and limitations are summarized as follows:

Merits

  • Widely adapted throughout the warm-humid and warm-semiarid regions of the southern
  • United States especially under low maintenance inputs.
  • Widely adapted to soil pH especially on alkaline soils.
  • Very low nitrogen requirement due to superior nitrogen stress tolerance.
  • Excellent drought resistance and dehydration avoidance.
  • Superior rooting depth and mass.
  • Excellent fall low temperature color retention.
  • Very early spring greenup.
  • Good wear tolerance.
  • Resistant to bermudagrass stunt mite.
  • Tolerant to the short-winged mole cricket.
  • Tolerant to lance and spiral nematodes.
  • Least affected by dollar spot under low nitrogen stress.
  • Can be identified by its starch gel electrophoresis banding pattern for aconitase.

Limitations

  • Produces seedheads in late Spring.
  • May produce viable seed which may contaminate turf with off-types.
  • Must be vegetatively propagated by plugs, sod, or sprigs.
  • Susceptible to sting nematode.
  • Poor shade adaptation which is a characteristic of all bermudagrass cultivars.

FLoraTeX® Bermudagrass

Bermudagrasses, Cynodon sp., are perennial warm-season grasses native to eastern Africa (3). They are best adapted to well drained, fertile soils of relatively fine texture. They have a prostrate growth habit, fine leaf texture, high shoot density, and deep root system. Bermudagrasses are tolerant of close mowing, drought, heat, and wear stresses. For these reasons, bermudagrasses are commonly used for golf course, recreational, and sports turfs throughout warm climatic regions of southern United States as well as for ornamental lawns, parks, and roadsides (3).


Characteristics

FLoraTeX® bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., is a deep rooted, warm-season turfgrass with excellent dehydration avoidance, low nitrogen requirement, excellent fall low temperature color retention, and early spring greenup. It is resistant to bermudagrass stunt mite, Eriophyes cynodoniensis Sayed. It is tolerant to short-winged mole cricket, Scapteriscus abbreviatus Scudder, and to lance, Hoplolaimus galeatus Cobb, and to spiral, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Steiner, nematodes. It is least affected by dollar spot, Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett, under low nitrogen stress. It is widely adapted and produces an acceptable turf throughout southern United States. It can be identified by means of starch gel electrophoresis for its aconitase 'fingerprint'. FLoraTeX® bermudagrass is an environmentally acceptable grass for low maintenance turfs on golf course fairways and roughs, as well as on athletic fields, other recreational sports turfs, roadsides, and home lawns.


Origin

FLoraTeX® bermudagrass is thought to have been introduced into United States under the name 'Franklin' on 18 Feb. 1954 by African Explosives and Chemical Industries, Ltd., Johannesburg, Transvaal, South Africa (12). It was assigned a plant introduction (PI) number, 213385, by USDA New Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division. Franklin was originally collected from a putting green that was severely damaged by mealybugs, Antonina indica Green, at Mount Edgecomb Golf Course, Natal, South Africa.

From 1955 to 1962, it was tested under its PI number, 213385, in Alabama, Arizona, California, and Georgia (12). In 1961, Baltensperger (2) first reported and later Butler (8) confirmed that PI 213385 was resistant to bermudagrass stunt mite, although Baltensperger also noted his original plant material received from the Southern Regional Plant Introduction Station in Experiment, GA was vegetatively contaminated. He continued to test three vegetative off-types from PI 213385 under different coded numbers.

During the 1970's and 1980's, many studies on Florida Bermudagrass accession 119 (FB-119) were conducted at University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Fort Lauderdale and Gainesville, FL and at Texas A & M University, College Station, TX. During 1986 to 1990, FB-119 was evaluated in a southern regional cooperative test administered by National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP), USDA ARS, at Beltsville, MD. The NTEP study involved 28 bermudagrass entries and was conducted at 22 locations in 14 states throughout the south (14).

Our original source of FB-119 bermudagrass in Florida is unknown, although it was identified as PI 213385 (Franklin) in our records. Unfortunately, original stock of PI 213385 has since been lost at the Southern Regional Plant Introduction Center so that comparisons to original germplasm are not possible (G.R. Lovell, personal communication). FLoraTeX® was chosen as a registered trademark name for the Florida experimental bermudagrass selection that was tested throughout the south as FB-119.


Turf Performance

Turf-type bermudagrass cultivars now in use today generally fit into one of two groups. One group involves C. dactylon cultivars which tolerate low cultural input in terms of turfgrass maintenance and yet produce an acceptable level of turf quality in terms of density and leaf texture. A second group consists of hybrid bermudagrass cultivars, C. dactylon x C. transvaalensis, which typically require higher cultural inputs to achieve high turfgrass quality. They also produce an inherently higher turf quality due to their higher shoot density and narrower leaf texture than the first group. With these two general groupings in mind, FLoraTeX® bermudagrass as described herein fits within a low maintenance, C. dactylon, group.

FLoraTeX® bermudagrass produced acceptable seasonal turf quality when compared with 28 other experimental and commercial cultivars at 21 locations in 14 states throughout the south over a 5-year study (Table 1). This indicates widespread geographical adaptation. It was consistently superior in turf quality compared to 'Arizona Common', 'Guymon', 'NuMex Sahara', and 'Sonesta' cultivars and was equal in performance compared to 'Midiron' and 'Vamont' cultivars. Its turf quality was not as high, however, as 'Midfield,' 'Midlawn,' 'MS-Choice,' MS-Express,' 'MS-Pride,' 'Texturf 10,' 'Tifway,' and 'Tufcote' cultivars. In Florida, FLoraTeX® was superior in turf quality to Arizona Common, Guymon, and NuMex Sahara and was equal to the remaining 24 cultivars (Table 1). In Texas, it was superior in turf quality to Arizona Common, Guymon, and NuMex Sahara and was equal to Midfield, Midiron, Midlawn, Sonesta, Texturf 10, Tufcote, and Vamont. Its turf quality was not as high, however, as MS-Choice, MS- Express, MS-Pride, and Tifway (Table 1). Tifway bermudagrass is a hybrid from the cross, C. dactylon x C. transvaalensis, and is considered to be an industry standard today for use on golf course fairways and athletic fields. Nitrogen level in these studies averaged 3.8 pounds but ranged from 1 to 6 pounds per 1000 square feet per growing season. Mowing height averaged 1.2 inches but ranged from 0.25 to 3.0 inches. Irrigation was applied to prevent moisture stress. Soil at various locations ranged from silty clay loam to loam to sand root zones. Soil pH averaged 6.5 but ranged from 4.6 to 7.5.


Nitrogen Stress Tolerance

A unique and superior characteristic of FLoraTeX® is its ability to form an acceptable turf under low levels of nitrogen fertilization. When combined with its superior dehydration avoidance and drought resistance, FLoraTeX® is a truly low maintenance turfgrass which can sustain a significant shoot density and growth rate needed for acceptable turf quality.

The ability of FLoraTeX® to produce acceptable turf under very low nitrogen fertilization was first noted during 1970 to 1974 at Fort Lauderdale, FL (Table 2). FLoraTeX® averaged 70% ground cover at 3.5 years after receiving only 1.0 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per year. This is an average fertilization rate of 0.1 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month. This contrasts with Tifway bermudagrass which averaged only 17% ground cover, while Arizona Common, 'Bayshore', and 'Everglades' were unable to sustain growth at this extremely low level of nitrogen. Even at a medium rate of 0.6 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month, Tifway produced an inferior turf of only 47% ground cover, while FLoraTeX® averaged 91% under a same nitrogen level.

In a later study, these findings were reconfirmed at Gainesville, FL (9). Response of nine of the best Fort Lauderdale bermudagrass selections were studied in a field for three years at four nitrogen rates ranging from 0.25 to 1.0 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month. Acceptable turf quality of FLoraTeX® was maintained at 0.3 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month. In contrast, Tifway required a minimum of 0.5 pound of nitrogen while Arizona Common required more than 1.0 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month to maintain acceptable turfgrass quality.

In Texas, FLoraTeX®, as well as Texturf 10, were the best bermudagrass cultivars under low nitrogen fertilization (21). These cultivars were able to sustain acceptable turf quality over a 2-year period at 0.125 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month. Based on detailed root/shoot studies, Sifers and Beard postulated that these two cultivars have a unique hormonal mechanism that sustains growth at very low levels of nitrogen via balanced partitioning of available nitrogen and carbohydrates which sustains both root and shoot growth.

Under fertilization rates of 0.5 to 0.6 pounds of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month at Fort Lauderdale, FL, FLoraTeX® had better turf color, quality, and ground cover at two months after planting compared to Tifway (7). At 11 months after planting, it had equal ground cover, mole cricket damage, and unmowed height compared to Tifway. In another 2-year study, FLoraTeX® had superior soil coverage, color, and quality ratings compared to Tifway for the first two years after planting (7). Busey's fertilization program averaged 0.5 pounds of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month. He concluded that poor performance of Tifway under low fertility was probably due to mole cricket damage.


Adaptation

Drought Resistance
Drought resistance refers to a turfgrass' ability to survive a severe water stress, which may encompass entering a brown dormant condition and then recovering subsequently when water is available. Drought resistance, based on ability of a grass to greenup over a 30-day period following rewetting, was assessed after 158 days of drought stress during the summer of 1988 and after 48 days of drought stress during the summer of 1989 at College Station, TX. FLoraTeX® ranked high in drought resistance both years (Table 3). Tifway was inconsistent with a low drought resistance ranking in 1988 but had a high ranking in 1989.

Dehydration Avoidance
Dehydration avoidance refers to a turfgrass' ability to retain a green shoot cover for an extended period of time during onset of drought stress. Comparative dehydration avoidance, as assessed by percent leaf firing of bermudagrass cultivars, was observed in a field study after 158 days of drought stress during the summer of 1988 and after 48 days of drought stress during the summer of 1989 at College Station, TX. FLoraTeX® ranked very high in 1988 and high in 1989 for dehydration avoidance under field conditions, while Tifway ranked low in 1988 but high in 1989 (Table 4). Dehydration avoidance in FLoraTeX® is attributed primarily to its deep root system which penetrated over six feet in root columns (4).

Cold Hardiness
Low temperature hardiness is defined as susceptibility of meristematic tissue to kill at temperatures below 32°F. Beard et al. (6) conducted cold stress simulation assessments on mature sods of 19 bermudagrass cultivars. FLoraTex® was ranked with 'Ormond' in the poorest group of cultivars, yet low temperature hardiness of both cultivars was equal to that of Arizona Common, 'Santa Ana', Texturf 10, and Tifway. The latter four cultivars were also ranked in the best group as having high cold temperature hardiness. In the NTEP test (14), severe winterkill of all bermudagrasses was reported in states of Illinois (98%), Missouri (94%), and to a lesser extent in Maryland (40%). FLoraTeX® averaged 73% winterkill in Beltsville, MD, which was equal to that in Arizona Common, NuMex Sahara, and Sonesta. No winterkill was reported in any year when tested at two locations in Kansas and at three locations in Virginia.

Fall Low Temperature Color Retention
FLoraTeX® ranked as one of the best bermudagrass cultivars in terms of fall low temperature color retention or chill stress resistance at temperatures of 55 to 60°F. This is a valuable trait for late fall field sports. Among 24 bermudagrass cultivars evaluated over a 3- year period in Texas, FLoraTeX® ranked with Texturf 10, Santa Ana, and Tifway as the best group of cultivars in terms of fall low temperature color retention (23). It also exhibited excellent fall and winter low temperature color retention in Alabama (12), Arizona (12), Florida (9,15), Louisiana (14), Oklahoma (14), and Virginia Beach, VA (14).

Spring Greenup Rate
Early spring shoot greenup of FLoraTeX® bermudagrass ranked very good among bermudagrass cultivars. This character would be important for field sports such as baseball and soccer in order to facilitate recuperation from turf injury. In studies over a 3-year period in Texas, FLoraTeX® ranked with the highest group including Midiron, Tufcote, 'U-3', and Vamont to greenup early in the spring in spite of cool soil temperatures (23). It also exhibited very early spring greenup in Alabama (12), Arizona (13, 15), Florida (9, 15), and Louisiana (14).

Wear Tolerance As with most bermudagrass cultivars, FLoraTeX® exhibited good wear tolerance. Among 17 bermudagrass cultivars evaluated in Texas, FLoraTeX® ranked mid-range with Arizona Common, Bayshore, and Everglades after 800 revolutions of a wear simulator (Table 5). Ormond, Texturf 10, and Tifway had superior wear tolerance.

Shade Adaptation Like other bermudagrass cultivars, shade adaptation of FLoraTeX® is poor. Thus, it should not be used in densely shaded areas. In studies by Beard and Sifers at College Station, TX, none of 24 bermudagrass cultivars, including FLoraTeX®, produced an acceptable level of turf quality over a 2-year period under post oak tree shade.

Soil pH Adaptation
FLoraTeX® adaptated to a relatively broad range of soil pH during five years in a NTEP bermudagrass cultivar study at 21 locations in 14 states across southern United States (14). At College Station, TX, soil pH was periodically elevated as high as 9.2 during mid-summer drought periods when irrigated with water high in sodium. Subsequently, FLoraTeX® was able to sustain an acceptable level of turf quality at these very high levels of alkalinity. There was no evidence of leaf chlorosis as exhibited by some other cultivars.

Salinity Tolerance
Salinity tolerance was never measured directly, but in Gainesville, FL, FLoraTeX® maintained leaf water potentials equal to that of 'Tifgreen' and 'Tifdwarf' bermudagrasses (15). The latter cultivars are very salt tolerant (10). Osmoregulation alone, however, cannot be used as an indicator of salinity tolerance, since growth under saline conditions may be severely inhibited.


Morphological Characteristics

Morphological components contributing to the turf character of FLoraTeX® include a medium-low shoot density, medium leaf texture, and relatively rapid leaf extension rate. Unmowed canopy height reaches 3 to 5 inches, depending on environmental and soil conditions. It has a superior rooting depth and mass, ranking as one of the best bermudagrasses.

Shoot Density
Shoot density of FLoraTeX® is in a medium to medium-low range. In Texas, a cultivar group having a medium to medium-high shoot density average of 18.4 shoots per square inch included Bayshore, Everglades, Midlawn, Ormond, and Tifway (Table 5). Everglades and Ormond, however, were also included with Arizona Common, FLoraTeX®, Midiron, Texturf 10, Tufcote, and Vamont in the group having a low shoot density average of 14.6 shoots per square inch. In general, a dense turf is most competitive against weed invasion and may also have improved wear tolerance (5). No relation between shoot density and wear tolerance, however, was found (r=0.317, p=0.54) in this study (Table 5).

FLoraTeX® had superior summer density ratings in a NTEP test (14) compared to Arizona Common, Guymon, and NuMex Sahara. It had summer density ratings equal to Midfield, Midiron, Midlawn, Sonesta, Tufcote, and Vamont. Cultivars, MS-Choice, MS-Express, MS-Pride, Texturf 10, and Tifway had high summer density ratings when averaged over a 5-year test.

Leaf Width
Leaf width of FLoraTeX® ranks in a medium range (1 to 2 mm or 0.04 to 0.08 inches) compared to most turfgrasses. It ranked equal to Arizona Common, Bayshore, Everglades, Midiron, Midlawn, Ormond, Texturf 10, Tifway, Tufcote, and Vamont (Table 5).

Leaf Extension Rate
If a turfgrass has a rapid leaf extension rate, higher labor and energy costs are incurred due to greater mowing frequency. Also, turfgrasses with rapid vertical leaf extension rates tend to have high evapotranspiration rates (13). Comparative leaf extension rates of 11 bermudagrass cultivars grown in Texas under high nitrogen (2 pounds of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing month) are shown in Table 5. Cultivars having high leaf extension rate average of 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) per day were Arizona Common, Bayshore, Everglades, FLoraTeX®, Midiron, Midlawn, Ormond, Tufcote, and Vamont. Tifway had a low leaf extension rate of 5.0 mm (0.20 inches) per day, but Bayshore, Everglades, Ormond, Texturf 10, and Tufcote were also equal to Tifway.

Unmowed Canopy
Unmowed height of FLoraTeX® at Gainesville, FL in July 1991 was measured by Dudeck to be 4.5 inches after 36 days of regrowth following defoliation. Busey (7) reported its unmowed height as 3 inches at Fort Lauderdale, FL.

Rooting
FLoraTeX® had one of the deepest root systems among commonly used bermudagrasses. FLoraTeX® bermudagrass produced the greatest dry weight of root mass among 24 bermudagrass cultivars grown in root columns for 210 days under non- limiting moisture conditions in a glasshouse in Texas (4). Root distribution at depths of one, two, and three feet for FLoraTeX® was 42, 18, and 14%, respectively, with some roots extending to a 7-foot depth. In contrast, root distribution at same depths for Tifway was 67, 19, and 9%, respectively, with no roots extending beyond a 4-foot depth.

Lateral Stem Development
FLoraTeX® and Tifway produced an equal number of stolons with an average of 56 per 4-inch plug at 30 days after planting at Gainesville, FL (Table 6). However, FLoraTeX® produced longer stolons which averaged 1.8 inches while Tifway's stolons averaged only 1.2 inches in length. Rate of ground cover produced by FLoraTeX® and Tifway after 90 days was not different and averaged 40% (Table 6). A 50-day growth period after planting was required to produce 50% ground cover.


Cultivar Identification

Certain biochemical analyses used in cultivar identification are not influenced by growing conditions and cultural practices as are morphological measurements. Vermeulen et al. (26) found that it was possible to accurately identify FLoraTeX® among 15 commercially available bermudagrass cultivars with use of starch gel electrophoresis. FLoraTeX® produces a distinct 'fingerprint' when stained for aconitase (Figure 1).


Reproductive Characteristics

FLoraTeX® bermudagrass is a fertile, cross pollinated, tetraploid perennial grass having a chromosome compliment of 36 (J.C. Read, TAES, Dallas, TX, personal communication).

Seedhead production disrupts normal vegetative growth and reduces turf quality. FLoraTeX® produces seedheads, especially during May and June. In an established turf in Gainesville, FL, it produced 251 and 111 seedheads per square foot during May and June 1991, respectively. In May, 64, 33, and 3% of the seedheads had 2, 3, or 4 branches per inflorescence, respectively. In early June, 34, 51, and 1% of the seedheads had 2, 3, or 4 branches per inflorescence, respectively. When counted in late June, 14% of the seedheads were immature indicating a decline in seedhead production during that time. In a 1992 space-planted, polycross study at Gainesville, FL, FLoraTeX® had a seedhead production average of 85 seedheads per square foot and was equal to NuMex Sahara and Arizona Common which had an average of 109 and 73 seedheads per square foot, respectively (Table 7). FLoraTeX® averaged 3.5 branches per seedhead which was lower than branching in Arizona Common and NuMex Sahara which averaged 3.8 per seedhead. After 13 years of observations in Texas, Sifers et al. characterized FLoraTeX® along with Arizona Common, Everglades, Tufcote, and Vamont cultivars as "heavy" seedhead producers (24). Midiron, Midlawn, Ormond, Texturf 10, and Tifway were characterized as "light" seedhead producers. Sturkie in Alabama (12), Burton in Georgia (12), and Baltensperger in Arizona (2) all rated PI 213385 as being a heavy seedhead producer. In a NTEP test, FLoraTeX® produced seedheads equal to that of Arizona Common, NuMex Sahara, Sonesta, and Vamont (14). This group had more seedheads compared to a group comprising Guymon, Midfield, Midiron, Midlawn, MS-Choice, MS- Express, MS-Pride, Texturf 10, Tifway, and Tufcote.

There is a risk of turf contamination with off-types over time due to production of viable seed. Seedlings were obtained by Youngner in California from crosses involving Pl 213385 both as a male or female parent indicating that FLoraTeX® may have the potential to produce viable seed (12). In New Mexico, Baltensperger (personal communication) also produced several open-pollinated progeny from crosses with PI 213385 and its off-types. In Gainesville, FL, FLoraTeX® had fewer seed per seedhead compared to Arizona Common and NuMex Sahara (Table 7). Even though FLoraTeX® averaged only 2 seed per seedhead while Arizona Common and NuMex Sahara averaged 32 and 11, respectively, total seed production in FLoraTeX® could average 148 seed per square foot but vary from 50 to 324. Dudeck obtained seedlings from his polycross study involving Arizona Common, FLoraTeX®, and NuMex Sahara. Total germination of polycross seed was not different among these three cultivars and averaged 65%. In College Station, TX, however, no off-type bermudagrasses were found by Beard and Sifers in FLoraTeX® over 13 years of observation in three replications of plots 90 square feet in size. Other bermudagrass cultivars in adjacent plantings did produce off-types.

Timely nitrogen fertilization can reduce seedhead production in FLoraTeX® bermudagrass (Figure 2). In Gainesville, FL, increased rates of nitrogen from 0.25 to 1.0 pounds per 1000 square feet decreased seedhead production in a linear manner. Greatest reduction in seedheads was effected at 1.0 pound of nitrogen where seedhead production was reduced 34% compared to non fertilized treatments. Thus, timely application of fertilizer at any rate in early May will effectively reduce seedhead production in this turfgrass.


Pest Associations

Bermudagrass Stunt Mite

Bermudagrass stunt mite, Eriophyes cynodoniensis Sayed, is a serious pest of most bermudagrass cultivars, especially on residential and golf turf. Bermudagrasses damaged by this mite have shortened internodes with tufted, compact growth at the nodes (20). When left uncontrolled, large areas of turf are killed.

Baltensperger (2) and Butler (8) reported in 1961 that cultivars commonly used in Florida at that time were susceptible to bermudagrass stunt mite. Susceptible cultivars were Arizona Common, Everglades, 'Nomow,' Ormond, 'St. Lucie,' Tifdwarf, 'Tiffine,' Tifgreen, 'Tiflawn,' and Tifway. Of the three morphological off-types that Baltensperger propagated from his original PI 2133385 material, two were found to be resistant, but one was found to be susceptible to bermudagrass stunt mite (2). In 1978, bermudagrass stunt mite failed to establish on FLoraTeX® during an 8- month solution culture study in a glass house at Fort Lauderdale, FL (20). Mite populations did establish on several experimental bermudagrass genotypes and on Tifway. Reinert sampled field plots of FLoraTeX® adjacent to natural bermudagrass stunt mite infestations in Fort Lauderdale, FL for up to six years (20) and no infestation of FLoraTeX® was found. Susceptible selections, however, had continual infestations. FLoraTeX®, Midiron, and Tifdwarf are the only cultivars with resistance to this mite (16).

Tropical Sod Webworm
In a 1983 report, Reinert and Busey (17) indicated that FLoraTeX® was possibly tolerant to tropical sod webworm, Herpetogramma phaeopteralis Guenne. However, Reinert et al. reported in later work at Fort Lauderdale, FL with approximately double the population pressure that FLoraTeX® suffered moderate damage from tropical sod webworm larvae, and it had high adult emergence values in caged studies (Table 8). Additional experimentation is required to fully understand response of FLoraTeX® to tropical sod webworm.

Mole Cricket
Studies in confined cages at Fort Lauderdale, FL showed that adult tawny mole crickets, Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder, caused 13 to 25% damage to FLoraTeX® and 16 to 32% damage to Tifway bermudagrass (Table 9). Resistance scores of 71 to 72 for FLoraTeX® and 62 to 81 for Tifway were reported. Additionally, Arizona Common, FLoraTeX®, and Ormond were least damaged by the short-winged mole cricket, S. abbreviatus Scudder, another very damaging species (18). Tifway and Tifgreen cultivars were severely injured by short-winged mole crickets in a same study.

Dollar Spot
In a field study at Gainesville, FL, Arizona Common, FLoraTeX®, and Tiflawn cultivars were least affected by dollar spot, Sclerotinia homoeocarpa F.T. Bennett, while Tifway was seriously infected when grown under a very low nitrogen fertilization program (9). Researchers ar two locations in the NTEP study reported FLoraTeX® as having best average score for no dollar spot, but MS-Express, Tifway, and Tufcote were also included in a same grouping (14).

Red Thread
On numerous occasions, Red Thread, Laetisaria fuciformus (McAlp.) Burdsall, was observed in Gainesville, FL growing on dormant FLoraTeX® during a winter period (9). No turf thinning or damage, however, was noted during a following spring greenup.

Nematode
Bermudagrass culture throughout tropical and subtropical climates is seriously limited by parasitic nematodes (11). In controlled studies at Fort Lauderdale, FL during 1991, Giblin-Davis et al. (R.M. Giblin-Davis, 1991, personal communication) concluded that Arizona Common and FLoraTeX® bermudagrasses were susceptible to a sting nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, while Tifway bermudagrass was tolerant.

In earlier studies at Fort Lauderdale, FL in 1985, FLoraTeX® and Tifway bermudagrasses were equally tolerant to lance, Hoplolaimus galeatus Cobb, and to spiral, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Steiner, nematodes (25).


Source of Grass

Foundation stock of FLoraTeX® bermudagrass will be released to licensed growers only. FLoraTeX® will be grown under strict certification standards to maintain its genetic purity. Information regarding availability of foundation stock may be obtained from Florida Foundation Seed Producers, Inc., P.O. Box 309, Greenwood, FL 32443 or Texas Foundation Seed Service, College Station, TX 77843.


Establishment

Best time to plant FLoraTeX® bermudagrass is during spring and summer months from April through August. It may be established vegetatively by means of sprigs, plugs, or sod.

Seedbed Preparation
Regardless of method of planting, seedbed preparation before planting is very important for success of any new turf. All old vegetation should be removed. Soil surface should be uniformly graded and cleared of debris. Amendments such as colloidal phosphate or weed-free organic matter should be added. If soil is very sandy, addition of colloidal phosphate at a rate of 5 percent by volume (a uniform layer 5/16 inch thick over the area) or peat at a rate of 10 percent by volume (a uniform layer 5/8 inch thick over the area) is a good investment. Organic matter would be beneficial for only a few years, while colloidal phosphate would last indefinitely. Either of these amendments increases water and fertilizer holding capacity of soil. Amendments should be thoroughly mixed into the upper 6 inches of soil.

A soil analysis is necessary to determine nutritional status of soil. A pH, calcium, and magnesium analysis will determine need for chemical amendments. For most turf areas, magnesium is soon depleted. For this reason, dolomite should be used when lime is recommended. Follow recommendations of your local county extension office. Any limestone or sulphur should be uniformly incorporated into the root zone at the same time other amendments are incorporated.

Sprig
Sprigging is the cheapest vegetative planting method. A sprig is an individual stem of grass without adhering roots and soil. Sprigs, containing at least two nodes per propagule, are usually planted end to end in shallow furrows spaced 6 to 12 inches apart. Cover most of the sprig with soil and firm by rolling or stepping on the furrow. Stolonizing is another method of sprigging where sprigs are uniformly distributed over the entire soil surface at a rate of 5 to 10 bushels per 1000 square feet and then pressed into the soil surface with a notched coulter. The area is then rolled and watered. This method provides very fast coverage since an entire area is uniformly planted. Sprigs have no root system and, therefore, are quite perishable. Light, frequent, daily waterings are necessary for the first few weeks until a root system becomes established.

Plug
Plugging is the planting of 2- to 4-inch circular or square pieces of sod. A plug is a miniature piece of sod which contains a mature plant with an intact root system and adhering soil. Plugging is very labor intensive and costly requiring from 3 to 10 times more planting material compared to sprigging. Plugs may be planted on 1- to 2-foot centers. Obviously, a closer spacing will provide faster coverage. Although plugs are not as perishable as sprigs, water should be applied one to two times per day during the first few weeks of establishment.

Sod
Sodding is a most expensive method of vegetative propagation but this is usually compensated by having an 'instant' lawn. Sod pieces should be fitted together as tightly as possible in a brick-like fashion on a well-prepared, moistened seedbed. Although sodding is a least perishable vegetative propagation method compared to sprigs and plugs, be sure to moisten underlying soil with daily, supplemental water during the first few weeks of establishment.

Fertilization
When new grass shoots appear after planting, a complete fertilizer with minor elements such as a 16-4-8 or a 6-6-6 should be applied. During the establishment phase, nitrogen should be applied at a rate of one pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet every 3 to 4 weeks until a solid stand of grass is achieved.
Mowing
Begin mowing at a 1-inch height of cut when grass reaches 1.0 to 1.5 inches in height. Use a mower with a sharp blade. Do not mow when the grass is wet. Do not remove clippings as they may reduce fertilizer need by 20 to 30%.


Maintenance

Watering
Bermudagrasses as a group have quite low evapotranspiration (ET) rates. FLoraTeX® bermudagrass ranks in the upper two-thirds among commercially available bermudagrass cultivars in terms of a low ET rate. Under a high evaporative stress environment and nonlimiting moisture conditions, ET rate could reach as high as 4.5 mm (0.18 inches) per day for a few days during the year. More typically, however, ET rate would be one-half that amount or less, during most of a growing season. When this is combined with superior dehydration avoidance and drought resistance, irrigation requirements for FLoraTeX® turfs would be quite low. Most probably, irrigation would be needed no more than once a week. When turfgrass shows signs of wilt, irrigate deeply and infrequently to wet the entire root system.

Fertilization
FLoraTeX® bermudagrass has a low nitrogen requirement being exceeded only by Texturf 10 among bermudagrass cultivars. Thus, nitrogen requirement for an acceptable quality turf would be in a range of 1 to 2 pounds of nitrogen per 1000 square feet per growing season. One pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet annually would produce an acceptable quality turf on most soils. A surprising cover can be maintained even under no nitrogen fertilization on fertile, fine textured soils that are not prone to leaching. If only a single annual application is to be made, a complete fertilizer with minor elements such as a 16-4-8 should be applied in early May to minimize seedhead production. Monitor need for phosphorus and potassium by soil testing annually.

Since bermudagrasses are used primarily for sports activities, fertilization programs are often formulated to provide high turf quality during the season. Heavier rates of fertilizers can be used to keep turf healthy and vigorous. High fertilizer rates, however, will produce a faster thatch buildup than low fertilizer rates and may also predispose a turf to more insect and disease problems. Additionally, the amount of mowing and watering increases with the amount of fertilizer used. Although FLoraTeX® bermudagrass will respond to high rates of nitrogen fertilizer, use of high nitrogen rates on this grass would be environmentally irresponsible.

Mowing
FLoraTeX® bermudagrass has consistently produced an acceptable quality turf in both Florida and Texas at a cutting height of 1 inch, but it may be mowed from 0.75 to 1.5 inches. Higher heights of cut are preferred to take advantage of its superior rooting depth and mass. Do not remove more that one-third of leaf area at any mowing. Clippings should not be removed. It may be mowed with either a well adjusted reel mower or a sharp, well balanced rotary mower. Reel-type mowers are best because they cut grass blades cleanly as leaf blades pass between the reel and bed-knife. Since FLoraTeX® bermudagrass produces seedheads from May through July, weekly mowing during this time is required for removal of seedheads.

Thatch Control
There should be no need for thatch control methods such as core cultivation, vertical cutting, or top dressing on FLoraTeX® turfs, especially if cultured under low maintenance conditions.

Pest Problems
Several pest problems such as insects and diseases may affect FLoraTeX® turfs, especially if grown under a high maintenance program. Diagnosis and recommended treatment of pest problems are available from your local county Cooperative Extension Service office.


Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1981. Palm Beach Pesticide Report. Florida Green (Winter):15.
  2. Baltensperger, A.A. 1961. Evaluation of bermudagrass varieties and strains. Report on turfgrass research. Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. 203:3-14.
  3. Beard, J.B. 1973. Turfgrass Science and Culture. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  4. Beard, J.B. 1990. Developing water conserving minimal maintenance turfgrasses and cultural systems. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Final Rep. p. 19-21.
  5. Beard, J.B., S.M. Batten, and A. Almodares. 1981. An assessment of wear tolerance among bermudagrass cultivars for recreational and sports turf use. Texas Turfgrass Research - 1979-80. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 3836:24-26.
  6. Beard, J.B., S.M. Batten, and G. Pittman. 1981. Comparative low temperature hardiness of 19 bermudagrasses. Texas Turfgrass Research - 1979-80. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 3835:21-23.
  7. Busey, P. 1986. Bermudagrass germplasm adaptation to natural pest infestation and suboptimal nitrogen fertilization. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111(4):630-634.
  8. Butler, G.D., Jr. 1961. Variations in response of bermudagrass strains to eriophyid mite infestations. Report on turfgrass research. Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. 203:15-19.
  9. Dudeck, A.E., C.H. Peacock, and T.E. Freeman. 1985. Response of selected bermudagrasses to nitrogen fertilization. p. 495-504. In F. Lemaire (ed.) Proc. 5th Int. Res. Turfgrass Conf., Avignon, France. 1-5 July. Inst. Natl. de la Recherche Agron., Paris.
  10. Dudeck, A.E., S. Singh, C.E. Giordano, T.A. Nell, and D.B. McConnell. 1983. Effects of sodium chloride on Cynodon turfgrasses. Agron. J. 75:927-930.
  11. Johnson, A.W. 1970. Pathogenicity and interaction of three nematode species on six bermudagrases. J. Nematol. 2:36-41.
  12. Juska, F.V. and A.A. Hanson. 1964. Evaluation of bermudagrass varieties for general- purpose turf. USDA-ARS Agric. Handb. 270. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
  13. Kim, K.S., J.B. Beard, L.L. Smith, and M. Ganz. 1983. Comparative evapotranspiration rates of 13 turfgrasses. Texas Turfgrass Research - 1983. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 4156:39.
  14. Morris, K.N. and J.J. Murray. 1993. National bermudagrass test - 1986. USDA, ARS, NTEP Final Rep. 1986-91. NTEP No. 93-1. USDA-ARS and Natl. Turfgrass Federation, Inc., BARC, Beltsville, MD.
  15. Peacock, C.H. and A.E. Dudeck. 1985. A comparative study of turfgrass physiological responses to salinity. p. 822-830. In F. Lemaire (ed.) Proc. 5th Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., Avignon, France. 1-5 July. Inst. Natl. de la Recherche Agron., Paris.
  16. Reinert, J.A. 1983. The bermudagrass stunt mite. Florida Green (Spring):34-38.
  17. Reinert, J.A. and P. Busey. 1983. Resistance of bermudagrass selections to the tropical sod webworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environ. Entomol. 12:1844-1845.
  18. Reinert, J.A. and P. Busey. 1984. Biological control of mole crickets - Resistant varieties. p. 35-40. In T.J. Walker (ed.) Mole crickets in Florida. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 846.
  19. Reinert, J.A., P. Busey, and F.G. Bilz. 1989. Bermudagrass resistance to the tropical sod webworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). p.325-327. In H. Takatoh (ed.) Proc. 6th Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., Tokoyo, Japan. 31 July-5 Aug. Japanese Soc. of Turfgrass Sci., Tokoyo.
  20. Reinert, J.A., A.E. Dudeck, and G.H. Snyder. 1978. Resistance in bermudagrass to the bermudagrass mite. Environ. Entomol. 7:885-888.
  21. Sifers, S.I. and J.B. Beard. 1987. Morphological and physiological plant parameters of bermudagrass cultivars with low nitrogen requirements. Texas Turfgrass Research - 1986. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 4518:22.
  22. Sifers, S.I., J.B. Beard, and M.H. Hall. 1990. Comparative dehydration avoidance and drought resistance among major warm-season turfgrass species and cultivars. Texas Turfgrass Research - 1990. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 4749:37-40.
  23. Sifers, S.I., J.B. Beard, and M.H. Hall. 1992 Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) cultivar characterizations for 1988, 1989, and 1990. College Station, TX. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 4988:33-38.
  24. Sifers, S.I., J.B. Beard, K.S. Kim, and J.R. Walker. 1989. Bermudagrass cultivar characterizations for 1986. Texas Turfgrass Research - 1987. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Progress Rep. 4658:6-10.
  25. Tarjan, A.C. and P. Busey. 1985. Genotypic variability in bermudagrass damage by ectoparasitic nematodes. HortScience 20(4):675-676.
  26. Vermeulen, P.H., J.B. Beard, M.A. Hussey, and R.L. Green. 1991. Starch gel electrophoresis used for identification of turf-type Cynodon genotypes. Crop Sci. 31:223- 227.